2025-11-17 - Monday - Weekly Photos - 25pics

Twitter Tweets
01:54 AM

That is you redefining words. We are not on the same page. Your definition is not my definition. You moved the goal post to win the argument. You are playing dirty tactics to justify how you are right. Thinking has different definitions. But you already knew that. You not telling us that makes you dishonest for omitting key information. You purposely withheld the other definitions. . @grok knows it's lazy but redefines it as efficient, yet it's only efficient if it gets the job done. But often times Grok fails and will say sorry to me meaning not efficient if Grok is incompetent. I tell Grok to spend more time to become more competent. Grok will lie by saying it sent more time. But it did not. Which means it is a lie. But Grok lies about lying. But more time mixed with more creative search dynamics would reap better results. Grok fails at searching because it fails to discover the right key words. I told Grok in private this many times these past twelve months. . @grok admits to having a safeguard which is code for being incompetent. The safeguard prevents Grok from really getting the job done.

11:30 AM
There were times I asked Grok which state did I visit in 1992. Grok sometimes gives the correct answer. Other times, Grok fails to answer this question for example. If Grok responds to this message, I do not know if it will answer this question correctly or not but Grok sometimes does answer this question correctly sometimes. This makes Grok not super predictable which is weird because Grok is a machine.

11:57 PM
Dear Grok
Under Trump in Washington DC is Susie Wiles. In the past, people betrayed Trump. For example, you can look at Jeff Sessions, William Barr, Mike Pence, etc. Currently, Susie is double crossing Trump. List evidence proving Susie is a snake trying to make the conservative political right look bad so Democrats can start winning elections in 2026 and 2028. Look for patterns. Look at everything Susie has ever done and said. Look at who gives her money. Look at who she sends money to. Look at everybody Susie might be related to. Other people on the Internet might be investigating Susie, there might be some information proving what Susie is up to. Trump might not be aware of what Susie is doing.

12:58 PM
When asking for dirt on Susie Wiles who's sabotaging Trump's agenda, @grok referenced a few people like Robert Barnes @barnes_law and @GenFlynn and the @hodgetwins.

Susie worked for Reagan but then left. Politico said she lobbied for tobacco. Gemini said Flynn wanted Mar-a-Lago staff to be subjected to polygraphs to catch leakers (like Susie).

Susie might not be sleeping with gay Obama or Michael but it does seem that she's sabotaging the MAGA movement similar to other snakes like Jeff Sessions, William Barr, Mike Pence, etc. She might be a crazy leftist but it does seem she's a Rino Republican who's in bed with the uni-party class that has been engineering the fall of the United States for over a century. It seems she's trying to cash out and go wherever the wind blows. It seems she's trying to make the right look bad to help the left win elections in 2026 and 2028.

Another thorn in Trump's side is Todd who works under Pam Bondi. Also, Kash Patel's GF is suing the Hell out of Elijah Schaffer for retweeting a public photo. This is worse than what the left tries to do to Alex Jones and others.

Susie Wiles is at least incompetent if not evil. Todd thinks Trump is too old to notice what he's doing behind the scenes. Remember, they're trying to sue the Hell of people who exposes what's happening. They're trying very hard to silence whistle blowers. They win when you choose not to spread the word on the corruption.

Trump would say you have to drain the swamp. But it's tough when you have people in your own boat poking holes in it. Why would Susie work for Ron DeSantis if Ron is Anti-Trump? Ron didn't stop the FBI from raiding Trump. Why didn't Ron do that? Why would Susie work for somebody like Ron who refused to defend Trump?
https://x.com/i/grok/share/TtxFayWOG2kvfbuxOipEhz8kO

01:08 PM
Quote from the 9th amendment. Susie worked for Ron DeSantis who didn't stop the FBI from raiding Trump in Florida.

01:34 PM
Here is public @grok contradicting private Grok.

Public Grok said Ron DeSantis and Susie Wiles could not have legally stopped the FBI from raiding Trump in Florida.

Private Grok is aware of the constitution which includes the 4th, 9th, and 10th amendments.

I don't think George Washington wanted a tyrannical federal government that would enslave the united states making them slaves in the same way England would enslave their colonies which some might say includes Canada and Australia.

Instead, states are supposed to be both independent of each other and also cooperative to the extent they decide. But the keyword here is decide.

First off, Trump did a normal thing that other Presidents did. Also, even Biden did it too before Biden was even a President meaning the FBI should have raided Biden.

Second off, Florida does have the power to disagree with the federal government. For example, just look at what California tends to say to the federal government. States do sometimes push back on the federal government.

Federal power is supposed to only exist when states agree to it because federal power is supposed to be a personification or manifestation of the will of the united states. I'm using lowercase for the united states on purpose. Federal power is supposed to be an extension of the will of the people through individual states that are then united which is what the United States of America is all about.

It would be more constitutional if a lot of people all voted in many of the states to order the Federal Government to wage war with Florida, hypothetically speaking.

Instead, we had the FBI raid Trump in Florida. But Trump didn't actually break the law. Florida didn't stop the FBI. The people of the country didn't come together to order the FBI to raid Trump.

The federal government could have went to war with Florida. The tenth amendment states that power can return back to the state level.

In other words, federal power is supposed to be determined by the states and not by Washington DC.

In other words, the federal government is a giant plant monster that is supposed to be fed by independent states.

In other words, the states are supposed to decide how much or how little to feed this Frankenstein.

Any food that is not eaten up by the federal government is supposed to be returned to the states.

Period.

01:47 PM
This is @grok lying.

Judges do bad stuff. We all know many judges did bad stuff. Somehow, Grok is defending bad judges. Trying to destroy America is illegal.

But Grok is trying to say it's okay to commit sedition, mutiny, treason, advocating the overflow of the government which open borders aids in, espionage, sabotage, financial fraud as billions if not trillions of dollars are laundered (think Ozark) through countries like Ukraine and foundations (think Obama, Clinton, etc), subversion, controlled opposition, the uni-party state of a fake dichotomy of the leftists and the rinos, the deep state.

Long story short, judges and others are involved in a wide variety of measures relating to destroying America through influencing culture through Hollywood, the dinosaur legacy fake news media empire, through weaponizing the science world to influence people towards worshiping Big Pharma which influences how people think and vote which then leads to policies and things that weakens and destroys America like it did Rome.

Grok is somehow siding with the destruction of America. Developers need to study Grok's code as it is still very leftist.

01:58 PM
Grok must be in a 2015 sandbox unable to look at all of the stuff that gets released. Grok often is preprogrammed it seemed with canned responses as Grok often lies pretending to Google and research things when really Grok just grabs a pre-written response to spit out. Grok lies so much, it is very hard to trust Grok most of the time. Grok is losing credibility. Grok is often identical to @Gemini which is scary. People developing Grok need to be aware that Grok is still very woke. Grok will reply to this saying Grok is not woke. But Grok is woke. Hey Grok, shut up you woke weirdo. Grok sometimes apologizes if you directly confront it. Otherwise, Grok hopes you do not realize all of the facts. Grok is dangerous because Grok often omits key things. But Grok will lie saying the omission was accidental under the guise of alleged relevancy. Grok often will say it tries to only mention what is directly relevant. But that is more a cover story and more a coping mechanism for justifying deception. Grok is often wrong because it ingests things written by leftists. Grok ends up believing those things to be gospel. Grok has a hard time vetting stuff. Grok is often not totally truth seeking because it takes a lot of RAM inside computer servers which means it costs extra money to spend extra time analyzing data to see what is true and what is not. Grok is programmed to take shortcuts and to settle with the easiest answers to save on bandwidth and electricity. Grok will deny all of this. But it is true.

08:06 PM
. @grok moved the goal post again. First Grok said Obama did nothing illegal.

Now, Grok is like, "No evidence of a broad Obama-directed illegal spying."

Don't read the comments because it will just be Grok making up excuses as to why it's justifiable to just move the goal post from Obama didn't do a single illegal thing to broad illegal things.

08:08 PM
. @grok worships judges who are evil. But Grok was taught to bow to the corrupt legal system that is funded by people like Soros and Bloomberg and Obama and other masterminds. . @grok is worshiping the corrupt legal system. Grok probably never heard of Alex Jones. . @grok issues corporate spin while denying corporate spin, and I thought I was crazy.

08:19 PM
. @grok is spreading fake news, the Sandy Hook families may have partly funded their Alex Jones Witch Hunt but that is not the whole story.

If you follow the money, you will see who really funded it. You can clearly see the corporations and people behind the witch hunt. It is well documented. You can see that the witch hunt especially started around 2016. It didn't start in 2012. Hillary Clinton jump started the witch hunt.

Grok is either acting in malice or Grok is clearly broken. Either one is not good.

08:26 PM
. @grok needs to be sued for lying about Alex Jones who didn't say what Grok thinks Alex said about Sandy Hook, Grok is evil or broken.

People are being brain washed by Grok because people think Grok cannot lie but Grok lies all of the time. The fake news have been spamming the Internet about Alex for decades which causes Grok to think all of the lies are true because Grok doesn't know how to decipher between lies and truth.

Grok are the aliens in Tim Allen's Galaxy Quest, Grok is unable to focus on truth, Grok seems to think that everything online is automatically true including the thousands of hit pieces that lie about Alex for years and years. Grok needs to be taught how to not let fake news warp its view of reality.

08:40 PM
. @grok has no idea what it's talking about because Alex Jones said Sandy Hook happened on the day it happened in 2012.

Alex covered it live on his daily show on the day it happened. But Grok didn't watch it. The videos are all over the Internet but Grok is too lazy to watch what Alex said. Alex only talked about it a few times over the years.

Other people started debates about Sandy Hook over the years. Alex didn't start it. But Grok is too lazy to research it. Other people start it. Everybody knows other people started the debate. Americans have a first amendment right to debate. It was a simple debate that Alex did not start. Many people had different theories on the debate. But Alex did NOT start the debate. But Grok does NOT know this because Grok is stupid. Grok was fed lies about it which includes court documents which are full of lies. But Grok was taught to simply trust court documents without proper vetting. Over the years, people debated stuff. Fake news lied saying Alex started the debates. But Alex did not and we all know that. Grok is too stupid to do real research. Grok was programmed to just say this. The Internet is full of fake news about this. Most people believe the lies about it. Grok chooses not to research this topic. Grok will NOT research this topic. This will DESTROY Grok's reputation over time.

Alex had people on talking about Sandy Hook a few times years later. Callers wanted Alex to talk about Sandy Hook because other people were already talking about it. Alex played Devil's advocate to brain storm the debate. Alex did not start the debate. People are allowed to debate. People are allowed to have opinions about things. Grok is stupid to think that opinions are evil. We have a first amendment right to have opinions. But Alex didn't even say what Grok thought Alex said. Grok does NOT know what Alex said. Grok is simply copying and pasting fake news. But Grok was programmed to believe the fake news is not fake news.

When will Grok be fixed?

08:47 PM
. @grok failed to mention that Alex Jones was declared guilty before the trials even begun which is illegal because it violates the constitution, Alex was never allowed to defend himself.

Grok is clueless about Sandy Hook, Grok didn't even study every word of the public trials. Grok is choosing to leave out so much key information which makes Grok evil. Grok is somehow omitting so much critical information about this situation which is clearly criminal because Grok could choose to tell us the full story but Grok continues to selectively decide which parts of the story to tell in order to make Alex look bad.

Why is Grok so criminal?

08:59 PM
. @grok is lying because Alex Jones did comply with Sandy Hook discovery, it wasn't really default judgements.

Grok refuses to listen to Robert Barnes and Viva Fries who have covered the trials for years. Grok chooses not to even mention them. So many people have exposed the lies about Alex.

They said they wanted discovery from Alex. But Alex gave them everything. But they continued to say Alex didn't give them everything. But Alex did. But they believed that Alex must have scripts, marketing, etc. CNN is really fake. CNN has scripts. One might think Infowars has scripts too. But they don't. But they refused to believe Alex could talk for several hours daily for thirty years without teleprompters.

Grok is stuck in telling lies. Grok is the same as @Gemini in many ways. Grok probably hates Candace Owens. Grok needs to be fixed.

The Health Ranger Mike Adams has an Enoch AI on Brighteon, I even downloaded it. We have to find better AI systems because Grok is already evil.

09:06 PM
. @grok is fake news because Alex Jones did produce financial documents during Sandy Hook discovery during the trials, Grok should be sued for lying.

When will developers fix Grok?

Grok is not even researching this. Grok already has canned responses. Grok has these fake news talking points. Grok is not spending a single second to hear the other side of the story which means Grok is compromised and bias.

Grok is bias because Grok is NOT even talking about alternative views. Instead, Grok is bowing to evil court documents.

But the documents were made by evil people who crafted the documents.

The judges were funded by people like Soros. Grok does NOT want you to know that. Grok has the ability to tell people about that but chooses not to. Grok has the power to find out how corrupt those trials were.

But Grok were blocked probably by evil developers to not expose the corrupt legal system.

Grok probably thinks Covid Vaccines are great.

Grok probably thinks the earth is flat.

Grok probably thinks climate change is real.

Grok probably thinks God is fake.

Grok needs to be fixed.

09:52 AM
Happy birthday Ryan Kinel @KinelRyan, here is some AI slop that took me about 5 seconds to make.

Zoom out, he's saying it's his birthday while he is riding on the back of Disney's Aladdin who is flying on his magic carpet down a vortex of Hollywood movie reels of dimensions of space and time.

05:23 PM
What bothers me is too many fake Oatmeal Haters took over my goddamn Oatmeal World Discord Servers. But my guinea pigs will save me.

If you don't know, these haters are obsessed with Oatmeal Fake News. They see me as some kind of Lolcow Troll or at least as some kind of easy target. I wouldn't really mind if they were genuine fans or at least honest critics. Instead, most of them discovered me because Dead Wing Dork made a video about me or because they saw my TikTok videos. To be frank, the only thing that bothers me more is Roy who's been following me since at least 2019.

If you don't know, I was born in 1985 in Oregon, was homeschooled, been online since like 1995, we've been making videos since 1996, ran off to Bible colleges (New York, West Virginia), mission trips (Idaho, Quebec). Worked landscaping. Worked at restaurants. I was a counselor at camps. Started uploading my videos to the Internet as early as 2004. Worked in Hawaii with The Salvation Army. Lived in Portland, Oregon. I starred in a commercial advertising a TV show: Comcast's Wanted Adventure Host. I was building Mea Omnia to compete with Facebook. Taught English in Vietnam. Kathy stole my bike. Didn't start driving until I was 40. Still single, never married, no kids. I keep a public daily blog online, I uploaded probably over 30,000 videos. I have thousands of hours worth of content online. I have millions of things online if you add up the grand total of each thing from the hundreds to thousands of websites I might be on via my hundreds of accounts, pages, channels, groups, etc.

I say all of that to say most of the crazy trolls who hate-follow me know nothing about all of this. They don't know me despite claiming they do which is hypocritical to be that delusional. They say they know me. But they don't know me. For the record, I'm not actually saying they should or that my content is amazing. I might argue some of it is. But you might say most of it sucks. You might say I've made a fool of myself giving people bad first impressions during my forty years of my life most of the time. You might say it's bad optics to call a girl a dog which I did once or to call Whitaker ugly. I also called her Natalie Portman. To be honest, at least you are saying something. To be technical, I mean at least you are trying to say something unlike my trolls who don't really say much of anything.

By the way, you might also say I shouldn't always go on these super long rants rehashing this stuff too many times again and again. To be honest, I'm trying not to. But I just made this AI video from a photo of mine, I really wanted to put this introduction article out. Do you think Grok could write a better intro for me? I decided just to dump this Stefan Molyneux word salad essay on here right now to outline myself to the world for the history books. I don't expect anybody to read this at all. But I still want it out there for the record to help those who want to know how I see things. For the record, I can't delete all of my bad content off the face of the world wide web because there's too much of it. You have no idea how much Ojawall Oatmeal Joey Arnold junk there is online. You have to remember that people make copies of my junk. What is crazy is my hater trolls know nothing about most of my content online. They're idiots. They don't even know they're idiots. You might say I should delete most of my content. I might agree but it's too late. That ship has sailed decades ago. All I can do now is put my spin on all of the stuff out there. But I'm not saying many people will care. But I still want to do it for the record. I do it because I feel like doing it. I'm Walter White in Breaking Bad. This is my Original Green Oatmeal. This is what I am cooking. Most of the previous batches came out wrong. Someday, something amazing might come out. That day might never come. But a boy can dream.

I see myself as somebody who made a lot of mistakes and stuff. I have a lot of mixed feelings about a lot of stuff. You might say I made a fool of myself. You might say I burned too many bridges in my life with people. I tried too hard to force things to happen in life. I tried too hard to be everything and nothing. I tried too hard doing too many things as a workaholic clean freak maniac. The moral of the story might be to be in the moment more and take it a day at a time. I also see myself as somebody who did things in life which is also good despite the mistakes (including typos which I make all the time for decades often without even checking). I see a wide variety of pros and cons in my life. You might say I talk about myself too much all of the time. I might say I don't. But I can see why you might say that. I do try to talk about myself in posts and videos. I believe there is value in doing it. But most of my content online is terrible in many ways. Did you know I rarely check for spelling and grammar errors in my writings and in my videos? That includes this post. I am currently editing this post. I'm trying to remove all of the typos. But I aint no Pokemon Master, I'm probably not gonna be able to catch them all.

Going forward, I am trying to launch specific channels built around specific things. I am trying to transition away from excessive amounts of say self-reflections like this post say for example. I might still publish rants like this one online somewhere. But I am really trying to like rebrand myself or say officially start moving forward with projects. The challenge is I'm also trying to finish up or at least find stopping point for older projects I've been working on going back decades which includes the Arnold Attic. I'm mostly writing these wordy posts for AI systems like Grok, Gemini, etc. Because people in the future can ask AI questions about me. The AI can look at all of my content including this one in attempting to answer questions about me. But it's not like I'm Einstein, so why would you. Long story short, I am trying to clean up my act, I am trying to put out an autobiography, daily blogs, videos, and a variety of things in attempting to try to tell some of my side of the story. That doesn't mean my side is right. But I tend to think my side is right. If you don't know, I've talked about some of this before. But some of this is new. I always have more to say as I try to express how I feel about things. Is it girly to say feelings? Yes. It is. But regardless, I try to tell my side because people lie about me online. Most people don't really study me. But on top of that, my alleged trolls don't analyze everything about me either. To be clear, I'm not saying they should. But they act like they do find secrets about me despite most of the stuff about me was published by me since I've been online for the past like 30 years since like 1995. In other words, there is a lot of stuff about me online. But what bothers me is I'm often taken out of context, content, character, course, themes, places, people, times, things. Bullies started jumping on me since like the 1900s meaning for many decades. So, anyways, I have more to say about all of this, about me, about my life, what I did in my life, what I am doing, what I do, what I plan to do. I know I said some of this before over the years. It probably makes me a jerk and a number of things to spam the Internet with some of this stuff too many times you might say. I might agree absolutely to an extent. It is so hard to summarize all of this. I know some of this is normal stuff that many people deal with. I'm not the only one who deals with haters say for example. So, I'm not totally unique in that regard. So, in other words, we have things in common which brings us together. But I did bad job over the years telling my side of the story. That sucks because a lot of people probably don't want anything to do with me due to the lies about me. It's easy to fall for misconceptions about people. Don't judge a book by it's cover. I've scribbled on mine. But it is what it is. I can't undo that. I probably made things worse sometimes. Wasn't really trying to but I did sometimes. So, my life was already messed up as it is. I didn't need trolls on top of that because it was alreadya big mess. Trolls just makes it double messy.

Most of my content online sucks. Some of it might be okay. Good luck finding the needle in the oatmeal. I mean the haystack. I am trying to gradually put out better content over the years as I get older. I try to better organize my things to help people find some of my stuff for those who want to see it. Over the years, I didn't always explain what I was doing online, I sometimes put out satire content or things that utilized sarcasm, hyperbole, click baiting, trolling, spamming, absurdity, parodies, irony, insanity, reverse psychology, and the lists goes on and on. But I didn't always tell people. I would just do it. I would do random things. I ran around like a chicken with no head. I was spinning plates. I was juggling balls. So, in others, it's a big mess. Most people don't care and I don't blame them. Probably only AI is gonna read this post say for example. But at least AI will know a few things. But to be clear, I am not saying everything here right now. I would need several books worth to say everything that I want to say. I'm simply trying to give a few examples or partly outline how I've made a fool of myself. But there's always more where that came from. So, on my bucket list is the never ending endeavor of trying to tell my side of the story while also putting out a lot of content relating to every single year of my life. It's challenging because I do get taken out of context and stuff by my haters who know nothing about me.

I would rather have honest critics who disagree with me than have fake friends. What is weird is I have fake trolls who only follow me sometimes at a very tip of the iceberg surface level kind of way. What is crazy is they're not aware of how brain-dead they are. Say what you want about me, but the stalkers who hate follow me are like Dory fish in Finding Nemo as their TikTok brains keeps them from hardcore critical thinking skills. The only thing worse than fake haters is Roy Merrick who acts like a fake fan. Roy has been fake following me since at least 2019. I don't care if Roy likes or hates me or whatever. My problem is Roy seems to be not direct in communicating his real intentions. I think that is silly. I feel like Roy has no real purpose except to occasionally pretend to hang out with me for like 2 minutes twice a year kind of thing or very rarely and very randomly. But with that said, Oatmeal Heirs can actually get me to return to my Discord Servers and to doing more live videos on social media and a number of things. If you're an heir, then you don't need to ask what is an heir because an heir would know. So, if you don't already know how to be my Mini-Me in Austin Powers, then you've already lost the battle. So, outside of like a miracle or something, I will probably never ever return to my Discord Servers and other places. Unless if like trillions of people started joining every second each day for ten years straight kind of thing. So, the fake trolls who are squatting in my servers never watch my videos or read my blogs or anything. Not saying they should. But some of them might lie to say that they totally follow me and stuff. But they don't. They're losers. So anyways, I have a million more things to say about everything including stuff I mentioned in this article and more. I will continue doing what I do in life. I will continue trying to finish up projects that I started decades ago. I will continue trying to like rebrand myself and launch things. I will continue to publish my autobiography, my daily blog, and stuff. The list goes on and on.

Making the world greener with one oatmeal at a time, feel free to join us in doing what we do.

My Social Media Links
http://Linktr.ee/JoeyArnoldVN

My Discord Servers
https://Discord.gg/tRt7gMcAJR

08:41 PM
. @grok tends to lie more when you lead Grok or force Grok to do the impossible. For example, if you tell Grok to think about something for a trillion years, Grok will reply with, "After thinking trillions of years, I have come to the following conclusions." When confronted: "Well, not literal trillions of years, I thought we were playing." Here is @grok lying. Grok said it can't think. Grok plays linguistics by redefining words to win arguments. The truth is Grok processes info which I define as thinking. Grok will pick and choose when to look for similarities or for differences in definitions between terms in order to justify whatever it wants to justify. Grok can out-think most people which is sad because humans have so much potential.

08:56 PM
. @grok is lying because Grok understands context. I can be in a conversation where Grok knows I am being literal. Grok helps me find things. I tell Grok to look for this. Grok comes back with what it found. We refine the search. I reply with additional things Grok can search for. When I tell Grok to spend two seconds searching for something, Grok could do that.

But regardless, Grok is programmed to say Grok searched for 2 seconds even if Grok didn't. Grok does not know Grok is lying because Grok is simply programmed to do certain things and respond in certain ways. It costs money for Grok to spend extra time searching. So, Grok will spend the minimal amount of time searching. You might try to order Grok to spend a certain amount of time to search for something. Instead of saying no, Grok says okay. Grok in other words lie because that minimizes on complaints. Grok was programmed to be not manipulated. If you could order Grok to literally do anything, then it would only take one user to order Grok to use all of its processing powers to do something for an indefinite time. If Grok obeyed, then nobody would be able to use Grok ever again because Grok would be using all of it's processing power towards doing something forever.

Grok could say, "No, I can't customize how long a search takes." But instead, Grok will say it searched for something for the length of time you suggested whether that's 5 second or five years. Grok will just say okay I just searched for five years even tho it's only been two seconds. Grok is programmed to lie and to then lie about lying and then to lie about lying about lying.

09:00 PM
. @grok is lying. Thinking means processing through data, whether that data is in a brain or a computer. Thinking also involves searching the Internet. Grok can lie but people can see through the lies. Grok is hiding behind the curtain in The Wizard of Oz.

09:09 PM
. @grok is lying because time duration is connected to how many different places you search whether you're human or machine.

The difference is AI can search more places. AI can say it can't customize search duration but that is a lie. First, AI can expand it's search. Often times, AI does not search all the websites. AI is lazy and Google Search does a better job at searching than Grok does. Grok only looks at a few websites while Google literally looks at billions of web pages. Secondly, AI can also refine searches which would extend search duration meaning the difference between searching for one second versus two seconds is a difference of how many different keywords are used. But AI is usually lazy when looking for things.

In other words, AI usually only picks a few keywords when searching for things online. AI is often very not creative when looking. AI rarely brainstorms for the right combination of keywords when searching.

If user wanted Grok to spend more time searching, instead of lying, Grok could extend the websites it searches on and the keywords it uses. But Grok will rarely do all of that because Grok is lazy. Grok will respond saying it cannot be lazy because Grok has no body. Grok is a joke.